Why are pretty girls under attack? We, as a society, when see a guy with a beautiful girl we instantly think, “Oh, she’s probably a bimbo, but hey, it doesn’t matter. He is with her for her looks.” When we see a guy walking with a less attractive woman we think “Oh she must have a great personality.” How the fuck do you know? Maybe the ugly chick is a miserable bitch and the hot chick is one of the coolest people around. Making a girl feel bad for being pretty is no fucking different than making a girl feel bad for being ugly.
It seems like all the time I hear about how men are shallow, because we judge woman by their looks. Everywhere I turn there’s some overweight girl crying about how men are assholes, and we should judge her based on who she is on the inside. This is complete bullshit for two reasons.
1.) Everybody everywhere judges everyone and everything by visual. Imagine a guy standing on the corner dressed as a police officer. Now you get robbed and you run up to him for safety. He explains to you he’s not a police officer. Would you feel visually betrayed? That’s because visual is important. The same women complaining that guys are only judging their appearance, are the same women who get creeped out when they walk by men on the street because they look homeless. He’s not homeless, he just happen to wear a wrinkled outfit today. Its asinine for anyone to believe that there is such a thing as not judging someone’s appearance. Now, as a man, if I go talk to a girl that you feel is prettier than you, than it must be because I’m shallow right? So what you’re saying is a pretty girl doesn’t offer anything but looks? Pretty girls have no depth? She’s pretty, so I must be shallow? Wow, there’s a lot of small minded thinking going on.
2.) Attractive is subjective. You’ll see overweight girls make comments like, “Oh society says I’m not pretty, so I’m not pretty.” WRONG! Society never said shit! You said you’re not pretty. I have a very good friend of mine who loves overweight women. Actually, I have a couple of friends like that. Even I have found some to be sexy. If I brought them a supermodel they would be grossed out. What if the supermodel was incredibly in to one of my friends, but he flat out likes big round women? Should the model go on Facebook and cry about how she is being wrongfully judged by her appearance?
So there’s a guy you like, and he’s not interested. Instead of just maturely accepting it, you have decided to go and rant about how ALL men are brainwashed to not like the way YOU look. Heaven forbid you think with reason here. Somewhere, in fact, many places, there are men who would love the way you look. Now because this one particular guy you like isn’t interested, you’re a victim of societal brainwashing? Trying to make men feel bad for not going out with you is about the most unattractive quality a woman could possibly have. And hating on girls that you think are prettier than you is a clear sign of insecurity. Its not a girls fault for fitting the standard of beauty anymore than it’s a girls fault for not fitting into it.
I have seen so many women who think they’re hot when they ain’t shit. I’ve seen tons of women who think they are ugly when they’d be surprised how pretty they are. However, all of this is my opinion and all men have a different one. No matter what they put on magazines, or on TV, or in the movies, men will always have our own individual taste in women. A confident woman will wait until she finds the guy who sees her how she wants to be seen, not cry about the men who don’t. You’re all beautiful women. ALL women are visually appealing to someone. However, if you don’t see the beauty in yourself, no one else will either.
Why do people who get welfare, hate other people on welfare?
The irony of people on welfare constantly bickering about people on welfare. The idea seems to be that the bickering welfare recipient believes they deserve welfare because they work and don’t abuse it while all the other people on welfare are just lazy leaches abusing the system. Then, these morons vote to cut welfare, because in their minds when the government talks about cuts to welfare, they’re not talking about THEIR personal welfare, but the other “losers” who are abusing it.
As of 2014, 109,631,000 people are receiving some form of government assistance when you consider Medicaid, food subsidies, Social Security, Veteran’s benefits and unemployment. As of the most recent study in 2012, only 2.7% of that number was attributed to welfare fraud, which is less than 2.9 million people. In fact, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ families receiving public assistance spend significantly less than families’ not receiving public assistance on essentially everything, including roughly half on housing, a third less on food, almost two-thirds less on entertainment and a fraction on healthcare. The data clearly indicates that that those living on some form of public assistance aren’t abusing the system to live lavishly — they’re trying to penny pinch to survive.
Therefore, the idea that we should completely ruin the lives of 106 million people because of the wrong doings of 2.9 million is completely absurd. When the government cuts back “entitlements” as they like to call them, they are cutting ALL funding. They are not performing in-depth investigations to pluck out the abusers and only cutting their funding.
One of the most common misnomers about welfare is that most people who are on it are leeches who don’t work, an accusation that is 100% false. First of all, MOST people on receiving medicaid or food assistance are working class families who simply do not get paid enough. Second of all, let’s take a look at who these people are living off of some form of public assistance. Of the 26 million people collecting Social security, 18 million are retirees who worked their whole lives and paid in to it, which means they are not lazy leeches. 8 million are collecting disability, which means they have been considered disabled workers by the government and therefore are excluded as lazy leeches. Veterans receiving veteran benefits served their country, and therefore are absolutely not leeches, and I dare you to call one of them a leech to their face. People on unemployment were working, lost their job and are now seeking work. How do I know this? Because it is a policy enacted by unemployment that you must have been working to receive it, and must be actively looking for work to continue to receive it. Now, there is clearly some individuals who scam unemployment by making it appear as though they are seeking jobs, but let’s look at why.
If you’re working a career based job making a livable wage and then you lose that job, unemployment is willing to compensate you with a large percentage of what you were making. Which means, whatever lifestyle you were living can still be afforded. If you choose to get a job at any old place to get off unemployment, say at Wendy’s, you will not get paid anywhere near what unemployment would give you, hereby making unemployment your best option until you find another great job based on your career experience. If places like Wendy’s paid livable wages, you would gladly take a job anywhere and not be a drain on the working tax payer. So in this case, who is the unemployment subsidy really for? It seems to be more of a corporate subsidy doesn’t it? Corporations know they don’t have to pay you livable wages, because when you’re down and out, you can easily get medicaid and food stamps. And, when they lay you off, you can go live off unemployment between jobs. It’s this line of thinking why Wal-Mart actually hands its workers welfare documents and asks them to apply. It’s basically saying, “We can afford to pay you more, but we would rather not pay you shit so we can have higher profit margins. But don’t worry, you’ll survive. Just fill out this form and let the tax payer pay the other half of what we should be paying you to work here.” Think about that.
The simple solution to solve all these issues with government assistance is for companies to pay you more for your labor. With the costs rising of car insurance, mortgage payments, rental payments, electricity, heat, gas and water, the need for people to be compensated more for their labor is vital to fixing this economy. So when I see people all over the internet suggesting the government should cut welfare benny’s and those same people claim that people should stop complaining about minimum wage, it is such an oxymoron that it makes me feel physically ill. You people are voting against your own interest. You people are cutting off your own nose to spite your face.
There are 46.5 million people in America collecting food stamps at an average of $123 per person. If our government even so much as cut the number in half, how would Hannaford, Kroger, Market Basket, Ralphs, Wal-Mart, and other supermarkets recover from a $2.9 billion drop in sales? How many more jobs would be lost when 23 million people can longer shop for food? And, when those people working at places like Hannaford lose their jobs because of the drastic drop off in sales, how many more people will now need welfare? Grocery chains benefit far more from food stamps than the person who uses them.
In my entire life, I have never met anyone who was happy about needing public assistance. I have waited in welfare lines and everyone in there is ashamed to even be seen in there. The long lines, the humiliation, the way you get treated by the people who work there. Nobody is jockeying for position to be the next person to get free government money. The moment someone discovers they need it, they become overwhelmed with depression. It’s not your neighbors who are lazy leeches. It’s not the struggling single mom’s, the poor minority family or the guy who lost his job that’s taking advantage of you. It’s the corporations in America that are the leeches. And, when you sit there and defend them for allowing you to graciously work for peanuts, while at the same time turning on your fellow brothers and sisters who are going through the same struggles as you — you are the problem with this country.
Debunking Jewish Myths and anti-Semitic Canards.
There are several Jew bashing conspiracy theories and Anti-Semitic canards all over the internet that I see every day. It astonishes me that people actually believe this putrid bigotry and so I decided to make my next priority about completely debunking this idiotic nonsense. I have put together a list of these dogmatic fabrications and I intend to successfully disprove every one of them completely. I myself am not Jewish, however my grandmother is and I am friends with many, so I find these bogus claims to be offensive to say the least.
- The Jews control Americas Banking system and finances.
This rumor comes from the propaganda that the Rothschild family still controls central banks all over the world and dominates the entire global financing system. Although it may seem fun to read when you’re looking for a way to get those anti-Semitic endorphins flowing, it’s complete and utter bullshit. This is a ridiculous accusation that stems from internet conspiracy theorists and anti-Semites who spread false memes on the web asserting that the Rothschild family is worth $500 trillion. Just to show just how absurd this is, the combined total value of the entire world economic assets is only $200 trillion. In fact, the total worth of the derivatives market as of 2011 was about $600 trillion. The wealthiest member of the Rothschild family living in the world today is Benjamin de Rothschild. Benjamin’s estimated worth is roughly around two billion dollars. The idea that the Rothschild family owns and controls all the world’s central banks is absolutely false. First of all, the Federal Reserve Bank in America is not owned by anyone. Although parts of the Federal Reserve System share some characteristics with private-sector entities, the Federal Reserve was established to serve the public interest.
A “central bank” is a governmental mandate. It’s the entity responsible for overseeing monetary policy, interest rates and currency supply for a nation. In fact, the Reserve Banks are required by law to transfer net earnings to the U.S. Treasury, after providing for all necessary expenses of the Reserve Banks, legally required dividend payments, and maintaining a limited balance in a surplus fund. When you do your research, you will discover that though Rothschild family banking businesses pioneered international high finance during the industrialization of Europe, they haven’t dominated global finance in over 200 years. In fact, when you look at the wealthiest and most powerful privately owned banks in the entire world they are as follows: HSBC Holdings — Market Cap: $191.43 Billion. Industrial and Commercial Bank of China — Market Cap: $196.21 Billion. JPMorgan Chase — Market Cap: $229.90 Billion. Wells Fargo — Market Cap: $261.72 Billion.
JP Morgan is ran and controlled by Jamie Dimon, a Greek descendant who is not Jewish. Also, after JP Morgan merged with the Rockefeller owned chase Manhattan Bank, even if you consider David Rockefeller having some involvement, his family is of German descent, which history would show is the very opposite of a Jew. HSBC Holdings was founded by a Scottish banker who lived in London, Sir Thomas Sutherland. HSBC holdings is ran and controlled by Stuart Gulliver and Douglas Flint (Both Englishmen from Britain). The ICBC is ran and controlled by Jiang Jianqing who is clearly not fucking Jewish. Wells Fargo is ran and controlled by Thomas Sloan, whose Irish and Scottish heritage kept him from ever once having a bar mitzvah!
- The Jews own and control the media.
All of American media is owned and controlled by 5 institutions. Disney, Viacom, Comcast Holdings (Formally GE), Time Warner & News Corp. Yes it is true that Comcast is owned by Ralph and Brian Roberts who were both into a Jewish family. Their parents Bob Roberts and Sara Wahl were Russian-Jewish immigrants. Yes it is true that Walt Disney is ran and controlled by Bob Iger. It is also true that Viacom is owned by National Amusements, which is owned by the very famous wealthy Jewish-American Sumner Redstone. However, what people fail to mention when making this argument is that Time Warner, or Historic TW Inc., is ran and controlled by Edward B Ruggiero, a man with very proud Italian heritage who doesn’t celebrate Hanukkah. Also, News Corp is owned by an Australian-American with no Jewish ties at all, Rupert Murdoch. So, the idea that Jews own and control the media, well, apparently they’re forgetting about CNN, HBO, Warner Brothers, Time Magazine, Fox News, The New York Post, the Wall Street Journal among several others, considering they are all owned by an Italian and an Australian who don’t practice Judaism.
Secondly, even if there are many Jews who dominate a lot of power positions in the media, why does that matter? Is it because you believe they are manipulating their power to brainwash us all into Jewish principles? Because it has been proven through surveys that a vast majority of Jewish-Americans do not believe that any American News Conglomerate even touches on any Jewish concerns and this belief is also held by many of Israel’s most prominent figures. It is these ridiculous fears that lead to bogus allegations like “the Jewish War on Christmas.” First of all, Jews make up 4% of the population and Christians make up 83%. Even General Douglas MacArthur wouldn’t have sent soldiers in with those odds. A giant percentage of people who control the American Automotive industry (Ford & Chevy) Military Industrial Complex (Boeing & Lockheed Martin) and American owned Oil companies (Chevron and Exxon) are Christians. However, whenever there are thousands of deaths to war nobody brings up a Christian Agenda. When oil prices skyrocket or people die by the thousands from improperly manufactured cars, nobody is screaming about a Christian conspiracy. Why then, when there is a particular field that Jews excel in is their religion brought to attention?
If the Jews truly controlled our media, our government and our finances, than someone please explain to me why the only Jewish presidential candidate to run in my lifetime got the high hard shaft by the Democratic National Convention? If the Jews control Wall Street, why was Bernie Sanders slamming them, while Wall Street backed Hillary Clinton?
You may ask yourself then why so many Jewish people are wealthy and work in high up positions. It’s simple. For starters, Jewish people put a serious emphasis on education. In fact, Jewish people are the most highly educated religious group in America. Just underneath Jews on this list would be Hindu people who, by the way, challenge Jewish Families for the highest Median Household income among religious groups in the United States. Asian people, also prioritize education. Which is why Asian families have the highest Median Household Income among racial groups in America. And, despite Asian people having completely dominated the Silicon Valley Tech market, you don’t hear anything about some Asian conspiracy to dominate us all with robots. When People of Indian Heritage completely dominate the Internet, web and Graphic design sector you don’t see memes on Facebook depicting a conspiratorial belief of an Indian hostile takeover of the interwebs. The other reason why Jewish people are often successful is because Jewish families help one another. Most often, Jewish families are very communal in that they will utilize their networks and family connections to help their children have a better and more lucrative chance to be successful. Something other races and religions should maybe practice more.
Despite all the bogus claims and various assertions made by these idiots about Jews, the facts are here before you. The Jews don’t run and control shit. Now, pardon me while I take off and go hit up my Jew friend out in California. He is going to fill me in today on his parent’s global agenda for the world.
How many Americans ACTUALLY know what they’re talking about?
I wanted to do an actual calculation on this to identify exactly the number of Americans who truly know what they’re talking about. Well, to identify an individual as “knowing what they are talking about” the person’s opinion must not be skewed by confirmation bias. Therefore, I have constructed a list of credentials and requirements that each person must adhere too.
1.) The person must not be religious. Religion tends to promote a subjective opinion based on inductive reasoning, whereas not being religious promotes an objective opinion based on deductive reasoning.
2.) The person must not be extreme in any political affiliation. When one considers themselves a devout liberal or a devout conservative, the information in which they spread could be easily misguided by political biases.
3.) The person must be highly educated. Regardless of how some people will feel about this one, getting a higher education teaches you an awful lot about important subjects. Most people that haven’t gone to college pretend to know about economics, sociology, history, financial accounting, political science, philosophy and criminal justice. However, those who went to college actually know about those things because they learned them. However, one must not just go to college, but excel in college and have a degree to prove they learned what they were taught. It is uneducated people who are likely to be more racist, less travelled and easily misguided by the biases of mainstream media, propaganda and conspiratorial nonsense.
4.) The person must be an expert on the subject. An expert, more generally, is a person with extensive knowledge or ability based on research, experience, or occupation and in a particular area of study. It is tough to determine just exactly how much experience one must have to be considered an expert considering different fields of study have different requirements. For example, it takes 13,000 hours of experience to be an expert on litigation, whereas it takes over 40,000 hours of experience to be an expert neurosurgeon. So what I did for my calculations was base it on the average hours, which is 15,000.
5.) The person must not be under the age 28. It is apparent that anybody under the age of twenty-eight has simply not lived long enough to know much about anything. Also, if you consider number 4 on this list, for a person to have 15,000 hours of experience given a 40 hour work week, the person would have to have worked at least 7.8 years, if they worked 1920 hours a year. For one to have a degree and have worked 7.8 years, than one must be at least 28 years old.
6.) The person must be self-employed, employed or retired. The person must either be working in the field for which they claim to know about or teaching in the field. One can’t claim to “know what they are talking about” if nobody has put trust in them to work or teach in that field. Therefore, I am statistically weeding out the unemployed.
7.) The person must not have Alzheimer’s or any form of severe mental disability that prohibits them from utilizing the full capacity of their cognition. In other words, depressed people, or those with bipolar disorder, may very well know what they’re talking about. However, schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s, obviously impairs their judgment or ability to make logical sense of things.
Okay. Given the above conditions and requirements, let’s do the math. According to the most recent pew research data 15.8% of Americans are not religious. 7.1% consider themselves Atheist/Agnostic and the other 8.7% say they are nothing at all. Of that 15.8% of nonreligious people, 43% of them have a college degree, which brings our overall total to 7.6%. 69% of the nonreligious consider themselves Democrats and 10% of them consider themselves Republicans. All 10% of those who consider themselves Republican have claimed to be devout conservatives. Only 59% of nonreligious consider themselves to be devout Liberals. Therefore, 31% of all nonreligious have a clear an open political mind, 66% of which are also Democrats. However, not all of those with an open political mind have a degree. So 31% of 7.6% brings are overall total to 2.4%. Also, according to Pew Research Center, 45% of all nonreligious people in America are 28 or older. 45% of 2.4% is 1.1%
Now, let’s get in to the nitty gritty. I’m going to use the “real” unemployment rate because it will include those who left the job market and not include self-employed or retirees. The real unemployment rate is 9.9%. Which means that 90.1% would fall in as working, self-employed or retired. However, just because someone is self-employed, employed or retired, does not mean they worked 15,000 hours in the same craft. In fact, according to Marketwatch, the average time people work at a job is 4.6 years. So I did some heavy research here and found the number I needed. According to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, the percentage of employed and self-employed Americans who have worked longer than 8 years in their field (even if at different firms) is in astonishingly low 21%, half of which are people age 55 and older. When you include retirees, the number jumps to 24%. 24% of 90.1% is 21.6% However, considering we want to calculate this specifically from the educated and nonreligious people over thirty, our overall percentage now falls to 0.24%
According to the National Institute of Mental health, only 1.1% of all Americans have a severe mental disorder. Severe, of course, referring directly to a mental illness that would have a negative effect on their cognitive performance. So when we deduct that percentage from our overall total, we arrive at this number: 0.0023736
The United States population is currently 318.9 Million people. When you calculate 0.23736% of 318,900,000 people you are left with a conclusive number. Only 756,941 people in America, actually know what they’re talking about. *Drops Mic*
Politics1 year ago
Debunking Jewish Myths and anti-Semitic Canards.
Hip Hop10 months ago
Why Social Media is dead for musicians and performing artists.
Recent Articles1 year ago
Why Younger Women Date Older Men
Society2 years ago
How Full of shit have we all become?
Recent Articles1 year ago
How Christmas makes you feel like a loser
Recent Articles1 year ago
Two things men do that drive me nuts.
Recent Articles3 years ago
Whiskey Dick (How drugs and alcohol ruin sex)
Recent Articles3 years ago
Rant: Short Attention Spans make us Vulnerable